Skip to main content

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Smanky Date: May 27, 2003 5:05pm
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Matt Nathanson:should he have been approved?

I think that you should really make the "transferer" distinction clear when people go to submit shows. I too was under the impression that "transferer" meant the indivudal who imported the show to the archive and NOT the person who converted the taped show from dat/md to wav to shn. Obviously many of us have been confused and I think it would be to everyone's benefit to maybe put next to "transfered by:" exactly what "transfered by" means :)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Smanky Date: May 27, 2003 5:13pm
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Matt Nathanson:should he have been approved?

Ok I just read though the "Definition of transfered by" thread. I am dumb, disregard my last post, I already see that you are discussing it.